Assumptions behind radiometric dating

06 Sep

This age is obtained from radiometric dating and is assumed by evolutionists to provide a sufficiently long time-frame for Darwinian evolution.

And OE Christians (theistic evolutionists) see no problem with this dating whilst still accepting biblical creation, see Radiometric Dating - A Christian Perspective.

A full discussion of the topic must therefore include the current scientific challenge to the OE concept.

Error Banner.fade_out.modal_overlay.modal_overlay .modal_wrapper.modal_overlay [email protected](max-width:630px)@media(max-width:630px).modal_overlay .modal_fixed_close.modal_overlay .modal_fixed_close:before.modal_overlay .modal_fixed_close:before.modal_overlay .modal_fixed_close:before.modal_overlay .modal_fixed_close:hover:before. Jake Hebert of the Institute for Creation Research.I could write a rather lengthy article in response, but I will try to keep things brief. Hebert’s closing declaration: This is a true statement.However, creation scientists have carbon-dated fossils, diamonds, and coal that are all supposed to be millions of years old.Nevertheless, they all have detectable amounts of carbon-14 in them.